Search for: "Sherman Watson" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2009, 7:03 am
"[i]Watson was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and alleges violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, and California's Cartwright and Unfair Competition Acts. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:55 pm by Brett Frischmann
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a case concerning reverse payment settlements of patent litigation. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:08 pm by Uthman Law Office
Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836,” that the trial court would have reached the same decision even if it knew it could not properly rely on all the factors it did. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a case concerning reverse payment settlements of patent litigation. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 7:59 pm
Watson Editorial Postlude Theory, Data, Interpretations and More Theory Herbert Jack Rotfeld [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:49 pm by Pamela Wolf
.; and Jonathon Watson, Associate, Sherman & Howard L.L.C., have to say about these scenarios and what practical guidance they have to offer. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
.; and Jonathon Watson, Associate, Sherman & Howard L.L.C., — they both really know their stuff, btw — I tagged along to complete the quartet. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
.; and Jonathon Watson, Associate, Sherman & Howard L.L.C., — they both really know their stuff, btw — I tagged along to complete the quartet. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:44 pm
Watson - but have not yet seen. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:20 am by Jay Cohen
Watson Courtroom 1B County Court at Law No. 6 Judge Sherman Hatton, Jr. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:46 pm
A year ago, Gardephe also dismissed a claim made by Bayer against Sandoz and Watson Pharma, both of which were trying to make a generic version of Yasmin. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
Mark Sherman of the Associated Press has this preview of the high-speed chase case, Scott v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm
To survive a motion to dismiss, the complaining dealer needed to allege only that the defendants’ agreement plausibly explained the refusals to sell, not that the agreement was the probable or exclusive explanation, in the court’s view.The decision is Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 8:30 pm
"   Only agreements that have a "predictable and pernicious anticompetitive effect, and . . . limited potential for procompetitive benefit" are deemed to be per se unlawful under the Sherman Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:17 am by Jeff Rasansky
Sherman Street and Spring Valley Road in Richardson, Texas. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
Watson, which will be argued on Wednesday. [read post]